It's interesting how the basis for living our lives is at such variance to other traditions and religious contrivance.
As
Europeans we have an individualistic concept of ourselves growing as
men and women to follow paths which take in the instincts of the moment
and the attendant opportunity which flows from a chance meeting. We are
annoyed at being slaves to convention and have no truck with playing a
role which is laid down by our elders.
In
other societies the role is reversed and the individual is subsumed by
tradition and culture to the point that we in the west shake our heads
and cry abuse.
The
Mohammedan tradition of veiling their women and excluding them from
interaction with other men has a sensible side to it in that not only
the men are protecting their exclusivity over the particular woman or
wife but the women has laid claim to the man in that within her society
she lays claim to his wealth.
A
description of the wiles to which a Mohammedan girl will go to preserve
her "value" in the market for finding a husband, and the training to
that end by the mother, produces a remarkable self assured product which
underneath the demure acceptance of the man's position, holds to
herself the controlling factors within the marriage and home. Here
tradition and custom set the rules to which the man must adhere or face
disgrace within his fellow community of men. So you have a balance which
is not always clear from the outside but within the society is set in
stone.
To
our eyes we see subservience and patriarchal dominance but within the
fabric of the relationship there is a hierarchy of duties which provide a
demarcation line and award strength to both parties.
In our "anything goes"
culture we skirmish like ferrets in a sack seeking surety like we seek
riches in a Friday night lottery dip. It's a game of chance, which is
no bad thing so long as we know the game we are playing !
No comments:
Post a Comment