Listening to a discussion
on RT between the Russian interviewer and a French women in Paris, a
journalist writing for the Telegraph one was struck by the influence of
each persons background on how they viewed the the satirical magazine
Charlie Hebdo which was attacked a number of days ago.
Russia
has been very strong in its handing out the retaliatory fist, for
instance in Chechnya where the Muslim population were crushed. So whilst
they are by no means soft on the Muslim population they are not
favoured with the idea of free speech. As a conservative nation, well
used to oppression of the individual they are concerned about the idea
that free 'speech is sacrosanct'.
The
women in Paris followed the French philosophical approach. People were
free to criticise anything, there are no subjects off limits and that
opinions were secured by the rule of law.
There
is of course something that smacks of hypocrisy, of double standards in
that racism has clearly set up a demarcation as to what you and can't
say, in fact it's carried to ridiculous ends with terms that are
innocuous but may upset someone's sensibility, these terms are banned
even from speech, whilst depicting Mohammed in a sexual act is deemed
part of free speech.
It
doesn't make sense even if, a secularist would have religion on a parr
with mysticism and therefore not of this world, religion and the
characters in the religious story are real to the believer.
If
the law against being critical towards a racial group or towards a
group with a sexual orientation is there to prevent disharmony then
surely being disrespectful to another group is equally bad.
Of
course what flows from this is that we will tie ourselves up in knots
if we restrict ourselves to being concerned about the feelings other
people. We may be misguided, we may be wrong but we have a right to hold
that opinion so long as we do not intend harm. Now the very nature of
satire is to poke fun, but it's a close call as to whether it does harm.
If
a Muslim is asked to turn the other cheek and not get upset why can't
we ask the same of the other groups, currently protected by law and and
by Political Correctness.
Freedoms
of speech means just that and we have in my opinion currently got
ourselves in a right old muddle as people are confused and bullied by
"another minority group", the dreaded PC Brigade.
No comments:
Post a Comment