In Dickensian days, Fagin was a dark influence in the social mix of London as he trained children to pick peoples pockets.
I
wonder how today's pickpocket, the government of Cyprus, will be
portrayed when history is written. The government has broken an
unwritten covenant that money held in your personal account, money on
which taxes have been paid is not safe and can, at the will of a group
of politicians be, in effect stolen !!
Cyprus has for a number of
years been a centre of financial money laundering, particularly from
Russia. The banks handled the huge inflow of money and laundered the
money by buying Greek Bonds. As the Bonds became worthless so did the Cypriot banking system.
Bailing
out the banks, will it ever end. Will we ever be free from the fear
that our Capitalistic System is intrinsically ruined by the
unidentifiable mountain of bad debt sitting, like a tumour on the banks
balance sheet. We shift
from makeshift solution to makeshift solution, printing money with no
comparable asset base to value it by. National debt balloons into
unimaginable figures which bare no relation to the productive power of the nation and therefore no way of bringing the debt down.
Nations are beginning to loose their "national" characteristic as having an identifiable entity.
In
a global perspective the world and the powerful companies and
financiers behind them, have little or no allegiance to a country or its
population. The globe is a checker board on which the chips (the
factories) are moved around or favoured in an economic game that values a
bottom line with no social element. We are just units of production,
who's ownership is blurred by complex shareholdings, emanating from
cultures that are often alien !! This is a brave new world !!!
Monday, 18 March 2013
Saturday, 16 March 2013
Land of my fathers paying tribute to the sons of their mothers
The has to
be few experiences in modern life that can compete with sport, the
conflict, one on one, fifteen on fifteen, nation on nation.
In today's politically correct society where "confrontation" is denied and we are forced into turning the other cheek, irrespective of the slight, irrespective of the fault, we often go home humiliated and feeling that the law is an ass,
Only in sport has the PC brigade been refused entry, we can still confront each other and not be collared !!
The singing at the start of the English / Wales rugby match played in Cardiff rings the roof with a fervor that makes one think how remarkable the human spirit can be, when raised to a cause.
We have become used to being manipulated into a placid, compliant people, confused about our personnel rights, about our identity, about the massive changes to the make up of our society. The cult of the individual being valued more than the collective, the slow dismantling, piecemeal of the National Health System, to privatise it and hand the doctors an open invitation to cream the society even more !!
Just to explain. The doctors now form an immensely strong element in the procurement of the drugs and of the services they recommend and administer to the patient. It is a licence to print money, not their money but the tax payers money as the doctor hold, not only their doctors licence but directorships in the companies that supply the services. Usually in business or politics you have to "excuse yourself" from the decision making if there is a conflict of interest but somehow this requirement, in such a prioritised industry as the nations health is ignored by the "privatise at any odds" Government we have at the moment.
Given all the confusion that people feel, the unhappiness they experience every day with unemployment, low wages, reduced employment rights and closures every week, the Welsh have their moment in the sun as they outplay England and of course, against you old enemy, it was twice as sweet.
The crowd sung their hearts out at the opening and are now wild with emotion as their team thrashed the ogre of old !!
"Land of my fathers" are paying tribute to the sons of their mothers.
In today's politically correct society where "confrontation" is denied and we are forced into turning the other cheek, irrespective of the slight, irrespective of the fault, we often go home humiliated and feeling that the law is an ass,
Only in sport has the PC brigade been refused entry, we can still confront each other and not be collared !!
The singing at the start of the English / Wales rugby match played in Cardiff rings the roof with a fervor that makes one think how remarkable the human spirit can be, when raised to a cause.
We have become used to being manipulated into a placid, compliant people, confused about our personnel rights, about our identity, about the massive changes to the make up of our society. The cult of the individual being valued more than the collective, the slow dismantling, piecemeal of the National Health System, to privatise it and hand the doctors an open invitation to cream the society even more !!
Just to explain. The doctors now form an immensely strong element in the procurement of the drugs and of the services they recommend and administer to the patient. It is a licence to print money, not their money but the tax payers money as the doctor hold, not only their doctors licence but directorships in the companies that supply the services. Usually in business or politics you have to "excuse yourself" from the decision making if there is a conflict of interest but somehow this requirement, in such a prioritised industry as the nations health is ignored by the "privatise at any odds" Government we have at the moment.
Given all the confusion that people feel, the unhappiness they experience every day with unemployment, low wages, reduced employment rights and closures every week, the Welsh have their moment in the sun as they outplay England and of course, against you old enemy, it was twice as sweet.
The crowd sung their hearts out at the opening and are now wild with emotion as their team thrashed the ogre of old !!
"Land of my fathers" are paying tribute to the sons of their mothers.
Not for Gods sake but for our own !!
When I was growing up, our household, from Dads side offered Humanism rather than a particular brand of Religion, whilst Mum would encourage me to attend the local Church of England services on a Sunday, usually Evensong. The church, situated in a village, was a leading focal point amongst the village community. The Vicar, along with the Doctor and the Policemen were the leading lights of a group of people, tightly caught up in each other,censoring and keen to pass judgement, yet helpful and supportive at the same time.
As kids we shared our parents, in so far as the grown ups were quick to set you right if they felt the need to and would have a word in the ear of a parent who they thought might need to know what little Johnny was getting up to. To be warned or even given a clip over the ear for being cheeky was accepted and part of the social tapestry.
The point I wanted to make was the place the religious institution had in the society as I was growing up and the importance of religious dogma in our village environments early years.
Given this inculcation of Christian indoctrination, which I hasten to add was no bad thing in a general sense, I eventually emerged with a more rational position, that without evidence and specifically, without faith, I built on my scepticism and moved through from being an agnostic to become an atheist.
Andrews gradual immersion into Buddhism has challenged me to think again about the meaning of life and the sense that their could there be more to it all ?
Of course my prejudice against faith based religions and the reliance on the word of God passed down through a series of revelations in a book that propounds to be the word of God puts me immediately on the defensive.
Buddhism from the outside, appears to be like another religious group. It has a distinctive following, dressed in distinctive clothing who it describes as priests, a distinctive, revered leadership, temples, symbolic chanting and distinctive music, even massive opulent statues of the Buddha are scattered around parts of East Asia. All the panoply that is usually represented by the established Church.
The teachings of the Buddha and the interpretation of those teachings by the priesthood have some resonance with Judaism.
Of course what you see is not the substance of what Buddhism is about. Buddhism is bound up in ones own, singular, exploration of your own mental substance, based on the recognition that much of who we are, is grounded on false values that can only lead to unhappiness and personnel disharmony.
The recognition that there is potential, to fundamentally acknowledge the cause of our "suffering in this life", by the objective examination of ourselves, through the mind.
To attempt to extinguish the external mental noise of events that happen around us, and the thoughts that flow with those events, which at root, falsify who we really are.
Its about retaining control of the way we think and what we do in this life, not for Gods sake but for our own.
Business as usual
The pigeon hopped off, eventually the white smoke issued forth and we have a new Pope !! The faithful, packed into St Peters Square burst into cheers and whilst the rain continued to pour out of the sky the people were ecstatic, determined to ignore the weather, this was a life time experience for many having travelled from all parts of the globe to say, "we were there".
The resignation of the Pope Benedict was unparalleled and having decided to stand aside we had the spectacular scenes of a 21st century departure by helicopter, flying low over the ancient city of Rome, on his way to a Papal Retreat. The helicopter was followed by the camera crew flying alongside, swooping around, in front capturing the old Pope on his last significant journey with the city roof tops falling away below. It was magnificent theatre and I was fascinated by the simplicity of how well it was all organised without much pomp but a lot of circumstance.
The new Pope is from Argentina part of the South American see, where the bulk of the worlds catholic's come from. He is from the conservative school and there will be little movement towards a more liberal stance on homosexuality or contraception. The secretive power behind the throne , the Cura, will be content, business as usual !!
The resignation of the Pope Benedict was unparalleled and having decided to stand aside we had the spectacular scenes of a 21st century departure by helicopter, flying low over the ancient city of Rome, on his way to a Papal Retreat. The helicopter was followed by the camera crew flying alongside, swooping around, in front capturing the old Pope on his last significant journey with the city roof tops falling away below. It was magnificent theatre and I was fascinated by the simplicity of how well it was all organised without much pomp but a lot of circumstance.
The new Pope is from Argentina part of the South American see, where the bulk of the worlds catholic's come from. He is from the conservative school and there will be little movement towards a more liberal stance on homosexuality or contraception. The secretive power behind the throne , the Cura, will be content, business as usual !!
Monday, 11 March 2013
Unforeseen influences
I'm reading a very good book by Hilary Mantel, Wolf hall. Its set in the England of Henry the Eighths, with its Machiavellian
plotting behind the scenes, as powerful families strain to plot their
way into favour with a King obsessed with Anne Boleyn and the need to
annul his marriage to Katherine of Aragon, against the weight of the Catholic Church, represented by Cardinal Wolsey.
I remember my Dad reciting Shakespeare. Words from Wolsey when he was held in the Tower. "Are Cromwell. If I had served my God with half the zeal I served my King, he would not in my age have left me naked, before my enemy" The echo of my Dads solemn words as he put the full pathos of the Shakespearian message into the delivery, comes back to me over the years, since, I was a boy with little interest in Tudor England and now, a man, I'm catching up on time, trying, as always to gain a wider perspective !
Thomas Cromwell, the character thread that runs through the book, ruminates about England and about allegiances, about the boundaries about trust and the concept of being a guardian.
In this case, it was the right of the King of England, a sovereign nation, not to be told what to do by the Catholic Pope regarding marriage which of course led to the creation of the Church of England.
The issues were tide up with Henry's obsession with Anne but there was a deeper root, that of a national will, which trumps all other.
A nation is like a stone in a fast running stream, it is buffeted about on the streams bed until, "overtime", it is worn smooth and could be said to represent the characteristics of the stream and the environment over which the stream runs. The forces that come to shape a people, are many and profound, they are organic, as is the temperament of the individual living in that environment.
We have witnessed and taken part in "an experiment" to create an artificial environment in which it was thought that the force of the stream would wear away the rough irregularities that were now to be introduced into the stream and that a homogeneous outcome was possible.
In many ways this has proved to be true. People encouraged to join our society have moulded into the fabric and respect many of the norms that were here before they arrived.
They of course brought their own norms which, shall we call them, "the locals" absorbed, food is a particular example. But of course they also brought much more.
Culture is difficult to define but runs deep in mankind. Its a sense of identification, like a story passed down from an elder, told around a camp fire about ones past, about ones forefathers, about ones heritage about the tribe !! A sense of belonging, a sense of a common identity. Mixed in amongst these norms lie the traditions and the accepted way of this or that,of the permissible and the none permissible.
The "Rule of Law" hovers above all of this, as a nation seeks to channel the tribal energy into self-beneficial avenues but the law its-self has its own characteristics depending on the environment (remember the stream). Some environments from which people coming to our shores have grown up, are naturally hostile to the Law. Their experience has seen The Law as a repressive force, used in the hands of an oppressive elite to suppress opposition.
Others take their law from Religion and find it difficult, if not impossible to ignore the calling of a body of faith which is so entwined in their daily activities that the cultural norms of the host country are rendered irrelevant other than in a formal sense. A parking ticket still has to be paid !!
This is a problem and was highlighted, just the other day. Students going to University usually obtain a loan from the "tax payer" to pay for the tuition fees, they repay the loan over a number of years but only if,when they eventually find work, their earnings are above a certain amount. The loan, as do all loans attract interest, a very low and generous interest but interest never the less. There is a growing, noisy rejection to having "interest" attached to these loans, by the Muslim community. It is a tenant of Muslim teaching that "interest" is an anathema to their teaching and avoided in his conduct in business.
This is but one of the thousands of "unforeseen consequences" of artificially, often ideologically, interrupting the natural sequence of cause and effect.
(I must say, we might learn something from this, as we persecute the poor with the horrendous interest charged "within our law" by companies offering short term loans to people who can't obtain a loan any other way, but that's another story).
I remember my Dad reciting Shakespeare. Words from Wolsey when he was held in the Tower. "Are Cromwell. If I had served my God with half the zeal I served my King, he would not in my age have left me naked, before my enemy" The echo of my Dads solemn words as he put the full pathos of the Shakespearian message into the delivery, comes back to me over the years, since, I was a boy with little interest in Tudor England and now, a man, I'm catching up on time, trying, as always to gain a wider perspective !
Thomas Cromwell, the character thread that runs through the book, ruminates about England and about allegiances, about the boundaries about trust and the concept of being a guardian.
In this case, it was the right of the King of England, a sovereign nation, not to be told what to do by the Catholic Pope regarding marriage which of course led to the creation of the Church of England.
The issues were tide up with Henry's obsession with Anne but there was a deeper root, that of a national will, which trumps all other.
A nation is like a stone in a fast running stream, it is buffeted about on the streams bed until, "overtime", it is worn smooth and could be said to represent the characteristics of the stream and the environment over which the stream runs. The forces that come to shape a people, are many and profound, they are organic, as is the temperament of the individual living in that environment.
We have witnessed and taken part in "an experiment" to create an artificial environment in which it was thought that the force of the stream would wear away the rough irregularities that were now to be introduced into the stream and that a homogeneous outcome was possible.
In many ways this has proved to be true. People encouraged to join our society have moulded into the fabric and respect many of the norms that were here before they arrived.
They of course brought their own norms which, shall we call them, "the locals" absorbed, food is a particular example. But of course they also brought much more.
Culture is difficult to define but runs deep in mankind. Its a sense of identification, like a story passed down from an elder, told around a camp fire about ones past, about ones forefathers, about ones heritage about the tribe !! A sense of belonging, a sense of a common identity. Mixed in amongst these norms lie the traditions and the accepted way of this or that,of the permissible and the none permissible.
The "Rule of Law" hovers above all of this, as a nation seeks to channel the tribal energy into self-beneficial avenues but the law its-self has its own characteristics depending on the environment (remember the stream). Some environments from which people coming to our shores have grown up, are naturally hostile to the Law. Their experience has seen The Law as a repressive force, used in the hands of an oppressive elite to suppress opposition.
Others take their law from Religion and find it difficult, if not impossible to ignore the calling of a body of faith which is so entwined in their daily activities that the cultural norms of the host country are rendered irrelevant other than in a formal sense. A parking ticket still has to be paid !!
This is a problem and was highlighted, just the other day. Students going to University usually obtain a loan from the "tax payer" to pay for the tuition fees, they repay the loan over a number of years but only if,when they eventually find work, their earnings are above a certain amount. The loan, as do all loans attract interest, a very low and generous interest but interest never the less. There is a growing, noisy rejection to having "interest" attached to these loans, by the Muslim community. It is a tenant of Muslim teaching that "interest" is an anathema to their teaching and avoided in his conduct in business.
This is but one of the thousands of "unforeseen consequences" of artificially, often ideologically, interrupting the natural sequence of cause and effect.
(I must say, we might learn something from this, as we persecute the poor with the horrendous interest charged "within our law" by companies offering short term loans to people who can't obtain a loan any other way, but that's another story).
Sunday, 24 February 2013
Whistle blowers
Whistle blowers are sadly needed these days to bring corporations to book when they begin to feed their bottom line, with little respect for the stated aims of the organisation. Sadly the whistle blower becomes a pariah in the company and their life made a living hell for speaking out of turn irrespective
of the validity of the whistle blowers case.
The power of the powerful to close ranks and protect their own when threatened, in turn, threatening not only the whistle blower but other staff who might be tempted to support the blowers claim. Important things are hidden and bad, even dangerous practice allowed to continue.
Should there be legislation brought in to make it a duty to report things which in the organisation are deemed wrong and perhaps against the law. The Stafford Hospital was full of terrible practice, the Residential Home that allowed old people to be manhandled are two cases where a whistle blowing, whether mandatory or voluntary, would have eradicated the harm being done. But of course these events are at the far end of a spectrum and the danger that vindictive claims made by employees, would have a platform to launch all kind of claim and counter claim.
There is also the emotional fact that it can create a subculture within the organisation that values litigation over communication and we know the damage to the greater society that the lawyers have created in offering the spectre of ambulance chasing. The legal profession are well versed in padding their income stream, to allow them another opportunity to fleece us once again seems a retrograde step.
What is needed is better protection for the whistle blower who perhaps, in the initial stage, be allowed anonymity whilst an independent body investigate the claim and if judged valid and a case is made, then the whistle blower as a witness, becomes known, they must be granted legal protection against vindictive action within the firm.
The power of the powerful to close ranks and protect their own when threatened, in turn, threatening not only the whistle blower but other staff who might be tempted to support the blowers claim. Important things are hidden and bad, even dangerous practice allowed to continue.
Should there be legislation brought in to make it a duty to report things which in the organisation are deemed wrong and perhaps against the law. The Stafford Hospital was full of terrible practice, the Residential Home that allowed old people to be manhandled are two cases where a whistle blowing, whether mandatory or voluntary, would have eradicated the harm being done. But of course these events are at the far end of a spectrum and the danger that vindictive claims made by employees, would have a platform to launch all kind of claim and counter claim.
There is also the emotional fact that it can create a subculture within the organisation that values litigation over communication and we know the damage to the greater society that the lawyers have created in offering the spectre of ambulance chasing. The legal profession are well versed in padding their income stream, to allow them another opportunity to fleece us once again seems a retrograde step.
What is needed is better protection for the whistle blower who perhaps, in the initial stage, be allowed anonymity whilst an independent body investigate the claim and if judged valid and a case is made, then the whistle blower as a witness, becomes known, they must be granted legal protection against vindictive action within the firm.
Saturday, 23 February 2013
The badge of being civilised
Having lost our credit rating from Moodeys, the credit agency on the basis that growth will continue to be inhibited, for at least a decade whilst our indebtedness will continue to remain high.
Growth is effected by the confidence which leaders of business commit funds, which they hold on their balance sheets, to invest.
The other major factor is an overall lack of confidence in our main market, Europe. In the private market, companies can not be forced to invest and our Government has no money to kick start the economy without raising our indebtedness to the sovereign fund market.
Well that's it then, game and match.
The money men through the guise of the banking industry developed a methodology that couldn't fail. Debt could be traded and therefore should be allowed, even encouraged, to grow so that ever greater profits could be made by the banks.
The bubble burst and we are where we are.
The money that had been pumped into the banks to build up their balance sheets, (money that came from us the tax payer), is not released to much of business' and then only on the most stringent terms. The money held by the larger business organisations will not to be reinvested until there is a favourable upturn and is rather hoarded on their balance sheet.
This only leaves the National indebtedness.
How much easer to trim the Welfare State, reduce the "handout" and, low and behold, the books will balance.
Of course there is a snag. "Business" now depends on these "handouts", (in the form of "benefits") paid to the poor to bolster the low wages economy and continue the myth of self sufficiency that this ideologue, Capitalism, post Thatcher has created.
How deep will they hack into the fabric of the underlying safety net which we have become to accustomed to claim, is a badge of being civilised !!
Growth is effected by the confidence which leaders of business commit funds, which they hold on their balance sheets, to invest.
The other major factor is an overall lack of confidence in our main market, Europe. In the private market, companies can not be forced to invest and our Government has no money to kick start the economy without raising our indebtedness to the sovereign fund market.
Well that's it then, game and match.
The money men through the guise of the banking industry developed a methodology that couldn't fail. Debt could be traded and therefore should be allowed, even encouraged, to grow so that ever greater profits could be made by the banks.
The bubble burst and we are where we are.
The money that had been pumped into the banks to build up their balance sheets, (money that came from us the tax payer), is not released to much of business' and then only on the most stringent terms. The money held by the larger business organisations will not to be reinvested until there is a favourable upturn and is rather hoarded on their balance sheet.
This only leaves the National indebtedness.
How much easer to trim the Welfare State, reduce the "handout" and, low and behold, the books will balance.
Of course there is a snag. "Business" now depends on these "handouts", (in the form of "benefits") paid to the poor to bolster the low wages economy and continue the myth of self sufficiency that this ideologue, Capitalism, post Thatcher has created.
How deep will they hack into the fabric of the underlying safety net which we have become to accustomed to claim, is a badge of being civilised !!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)