Subject:
Finsbury Park
Is there any difference between the Finsbury Park incident and perhaps the London Bridge incident where in both
instances the perpetrators chose to run down innocent people on the pavement.
Both were racially motivated hate crimes. One against Muslims one against non Muslims one calling for the death of
Muslims the
other for the death of people who did not belong to the faith. One seems
to have been more impulsive in that apart from using the van as a weapon he carried no other weapons and succumbed to
being overpowered without
much of a struggle, the other was a definite killing mission with
knifes drawn and a rampage amongst the people stabbing at random. Death
to themselves was part of the package
necessitating the police to shoot them to stop them.
The one, as I say appears to be motivated by a random act of retaliation for the spate of killing which has gone on,
not only in this
country but world wide. An amateur who had taken the law into his own
hands, a response to a trend of Islamic terrorism which seems well
organised and funded and has at its heart a disgust
for people who are not of the faith and not only the faith but a specific sect within the faith.
The "far right" as they describe the people who define their own hatred in terms of a specific group have never
been particularly
specific. Over time they have shown contempt for most non white people,
they have been contemptuous of liberal authority, or as they would put
it, the appeasement of being conciliatory
to others who don't fit a specific stereotype. As disdainful as they are they are not specifically terrorist, their marches are an overt example of their intolerance, nothing more and whilst there have
been in the past examples of extremism and violence, particularly in Germany and currently in Greece it has never been condoned by the public at large.
Of course Islamic terrorism is not condoned by the ordinary Muslim but there are references in the Koran which
do condone
violence and reparation. With a religion so closely tied to the
believers on the ground, the ordinary men who attend the mosque every day, a religion which is a part of their life in a way Christianity
is not part of the ordinary
Christians life style and observance, that in this total absorbance of
holy text and mission, then we must realise that the jahidi is much
closer to the congregation through
scripture than the "far right" can ever be to mainstream society.
No comments:
Post a Comment