Subject: A religious mind set.
It seems to me that much of the liberal discussion around what makes an ISIS terrorist go out to blow themselves up, along with innocent people is that the mindset is 'presumed' rational. The irrationality of extremist views, i.e. people
who hold
their specific religion pre-eminent in their lives have little or no
common rationality. The cause outranks the mayhem and public trauma
since the religious cause fills every crevice in the terrorists life, it is the be all and end all of their existence.
The term religion is such a broad church (no pun intended). From the benign Church of England style Christianity to the intensity of the Later Day Saints. From Orthodox Jews who proclaim the West Bank to be part of Israel's Promised Land and show a contempt
for Palestinian claims and place the Palestinian Arab in a category far beneath them, to the Hindu who segregates
people according to their birth in the infamous caste system. Then we
have the Muslim faith with its cleft between the disputed claims for
leadership
on Prophet Mohamed's death (Sunni and Shia) with a willingness to pronounce a fatwa or a Jihad against the enemies of Islam.
Islam is a religious movement which carries so much baggage. It seems to engender in its followers an extreme sense of
beleaguerment and entitlement. A survival strategy which teaches the
importance of strict adherence to the detail of the faith and a
rigour of worship that is, in the West, alien. The preacher has a text
which seems a mixture of religion and historical politics interwoven to bring the past into the present.
The diktat
surrounding dress, particularly female dress is medieval in nature but
significant as a dress code to distinguish them from us. The faith and
culture is not only patriarchal in emphasis but is tribalistic in its
insistence on conformity. To
be a good Muslim you must conform.
Conformity is the key to how people become so locked in. The Muslim life is dictated by the pulpit and what the pulpit preaches is god's word. The Imam who could also be a hate monger, encourages the congregation to recognise its
uniqueness and has a
ready audience, a pliable audience who readily promulgates their
community values into that collective called, being Muslim. It 'out values' any sense of nationality or the norms within another society, since god's calling is greater.
Western
sociologists try to emphasise the importance of 'education' in
deradicalising young Muslims, but if that education is seen to flow
across the values of the faith, in any way then it "has to be rejected".
There are no ifs and buts. It is called
a religious 'faith' because it often lacks a rational explanation.
In the west we have become agnostic to religion and would rather go our individualistic, often hedonistic way, paying little or no allegiance to anything. A total anathema to a Muslim person.
Not understanding, we continue to hope for integration but how can there be integration when the fundamentals are so different.
We are in a
bind because the numbers make the impact within our society of this
foreign religion, critical. The implications are not of the same as our
acceptance of single sex weddings or even xenophobia, the cultural structure and strictures within
the faith make for impossible bed fellows.
Only we of
"no faith" can accept the change since having no steadfast faith.
Perhaps we should be pliable and adaptable since what ever we think,
long as the rewards are there, our masters will put in place what ever
is necessary to make it worth their
while.
No comments:
Post a Comment