Its an interesting concept this twin agenda women felt in the American election. The election to office of President but even more so, the election of a woman to hold that office.
The need felt by women to express their gender as equal and in
many cases superior lies deep in their fibre. Largely men don't trouble
themselves over these issues, a man or a women will elected, may the
best person win but women who have thought of themselves
as being dealt "second best" quite rightly feel that at moments when
their team embodiment of who they are, a women, they feel even more
cheated than just the political aspect and you could see it in their
tears and the frustration in their voices.
Of course anyone could claim the discriminatory card. Black people could and do. Disabled people with more room for
argument than most, could and do. Religions discriminate against each
other (it's fundamental to who they are). The red heads versus the
blond, the tall versus the short, the fat versus the thin. And lately
the white male left behind in the dust buckets of towns that until 20 years ago were thriving.
Where ever you have difference you have competition, you have alliances and you have enemies and you invariably pick grievance as a way of expressing yourself
But there is no right way or wrong way, we are dealing with a
human condition which notices the difference and seeks comfort from
grouping together with others of similar disposition. Of course the very
act of doing so only entrenches the sense of difference,
with each grievance amplified in the group. The world seen through this
prism becomes distorted by which ever "ism" you are in, my grievance
caps your grievance and a merry old contest of entitlement begins.
So as the tears flow they should consider the elections and human
rights which they take for granted are seriously missing in two thirds
of the world and, with such a large catchment, its astounding luck that
that you have the time and sensitivity to
worry about such things.
No comments:
Post a Comment