I was listening to a debate on Feminism only this morning and it was significant, of how angry and how intolerant of the
anti-feminist views which were being expressed by another woman who's
pitch was that the feminists were in danger of driving a wedge
between men and women rather an trying to assimilate a union. Both
feminists were well known female politicians. I have never seen them as
angry on a subject. It occurred to me that if they could express such
vehemence on matters of real social divergence
we might have even better more realistic political outcomes which is
surely why we voted for them.
The intensity and the vehemence of the put downs seemed directly in proportion to some sort of 'blind intolerance' of
any other take on the matter. It seemed impossible to give an inch or to
accept that anyone can hold an alternate view and still be socially
benign. The extremists are the "others", the only intolerant people are
those who tolerate another interpretation.
In so many ways the definition of "fascist" comes to mind. A fascist is a person who is; authoritarian, totalitarian, dictatorial, autocratic and undemocratic.
The pressure and the blind surety of purpose describe so many of
the protagonists who fall under the banner, advocates of Political
Correctness. There is no debate, they have centre stage, in their minds
they occupy the only stage. There can be no discussion
since to discuss the subject would allow just a chink of light which
might, in itself throw greater light on the complexity which is society
itself. The shades and variation in the human story have no place in their fascist agenda.
"Speaking truth to power" has no place in their modus operandi.
No comments:
Post a Comment