The working of Parliament
is strange to behold. This evening a debate followed by a vote was held
on selling of land assets by London Transport to cover the shortfall in
revenue and government subsidy.
The
debate was to amend the fire sale of extremely valuable land in London
to a range of developers who wish to increase the long list of expensive
accommodation for the rich, often from overseas, to invest their ill
gotten gains, especially the hot money flowing into a poorly scrutinised
financial empire which is the City of London. There are billions of
pounds up for grabs and the initial debate simply asked for a list and a
valuation of all these assets which London Transport prepare to sell so
that proper public scrutiny could be made and adjudicated.
The
decentralisation of power to the London Mayor secures power in the hand
of the Mayor (Boris Johnson) who in my observation of his his
performance in the Mayors chamber seems ill fitted for the role.
One
gets the impression that the support for these assets, sold at knock
down prices comes from the usual places, it comes from the pals of those
hungry developers who sit on and behind the Government benches.
Parliament represents a closed shop and with it a closed mind.
Parliament
these days ill represents the interest of the people and clearly, with
a total lack of proper opposition, as New Labour, the brain child of
Tony Blair (who has been described as son of Margaret Thatcher) does not
hold the Conservative government to task in matters like this.
Is
it a lack of interest or is it a result of the parliamentary Labour
Party drawing its members from a university educated middle class have
ditched the working class for the middle ground where it believes the
floating vote comes.
Only
Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway had any fight in them and only
Galloway mouthed the contempt he felt for the coterie of self interest
that the cosy benches of parliament have, over the years produced.
Galloway reminds me of those stalwarts of the first Socialist Labour
Party Government under Clement Attlee. Members such as Aneurin Bevan,
Ernest Bevin, Herbert Morrison, men who didn't mix their metaphors and
argued the case against the Establishment with vigour and commitment. It
must be so disheartening for their ghosts to see the dismemberment of
valuable public assets to the same old faces by the same old people !!!
No comments:
Post a Comment