To be a non Muslim is a broad canvas.
In terms of faith one can be as devout as a Muslim or a person of no religious faith at all.
One
can cover ones head as a symbol of pious observance or laugh at the
concept of symbolising something superior to mankind. One can be
Congregational by nature or sit alone observing others in wonderment at
their diversity. The culture you were brought up under can have a strong
or a weak effect on your views and everyday character.
These
are just some of the myriad traits which define who we are and, in
essence, define us as diverse and different, not only our differences
from being a Muslim, but from each other so why then are we having this
conversation.
Well
obviously the context has to do with the incidence of faith based
violence in other parts of the world and the potential for it to spread
onto our shores.
Why
have these pockets of extreme violence, which go beyond anything we
have seen on this scale for years, been perpetrated in the name of
Religion.
What has happened over the last 14 years, since the 9/11 attack symbolised a major retaliation by al Qaeda (in its role as a militant Islamic organisation founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988/89 out of the Afghanistan struggle with the Soviets), to what it saw as western imperialism
What has happened over the last 14 years, since the 9/11 attack symbolised a major retaliation by al Qaeda (in its role as a militant Islamic organisation founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988/89 out of the Afghanistan struggle with the Soviets), to what it saw as western imperialism
Is
it purely the strength and success of the militant wing of the religion
or is it that this religion is unique in having a militant wing at
all.
Muslims
reading this page will no doubt disassociate themselves from any link
to "militancy" as they pursue their faith but it can't be ignored that
these militants ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda all proclaim to sail under
the flag of Islamic faith and are an interpretation of Islamic
determinism.
Perhaps
it's this concept of "determinism", the concept that every event, every
human action is preceded by conditions that could cause "no other"
event, that they are unique and have an inevitability which gives the
Jihad his strength and which we, in our wish-washy consumeristic world,
fear the most.
Give
that as it may, we are faced with a force of nature, a massive world
wide, faith based interpretation of how life should be lived in strict
observance of rules, with strict punishments for ignoring those rules
and which finally believes that they are unique in the eyes of God.
There
is no delicate way to put this. The power of that force, unless it
reinterprets its belief in Gods omnipotence (for a Muslim impossible) or
their overarching social construct regarding the way people live and
conduct themselves which is in stark contrast to the way, at least we in
the West are proceeding, then there's bound to be a clash at some time
in the future for society at large to fall under the sway of Sharia Law.
Militancy
can be covert as well as overt and the radicalisation of disenchanted
youth under a united banner is a powerful disrupting influence in any
society, especially in the era of globalisation where national
allegiance is diminishing and people are becoming bewildered.
What do we do and should we do anything ?
What do we do and should we do anything ?
If
we simply drift along and hope that the immersion of cultures and
beliefs will be sufficient to bring about some sort of equilibrium then I
think the falseness of that premise is beginning to appear in our urban
society. There is and will continue to be a massive tolerance shown by
all sides but for the "non Muslim" there is no "focus"
as to what his stance should be other than a capitulation of what he
would call, his beliefs and way of life. In fact he / she has been on
the back-foot for a number of years, accused in the media and the
establishment that it was racist or somehow not British to point out a
discomfort as the towns were changed in their racial and now religious
construct. Things will turn out ok, "we know what's in your best
interests don't worry".
Well
people are beginning to worry. One has to accept that there is no
turning back but we are perfectly right to suggest that from now on
there has to be some ground rules even if these rules appear to fly
against the semi religious fervour of the 'political correct' ideology
which has held us in sway for a generation.
No comments:
Post a Comment