Words are thrown across
the table like a Ping pong ball in a match, trying to thwart the
opponent and find some way to prevent a return. Unlike the table tennis
match there are no rules and no umpire to guide the verbal joust and no
one to decide the winner.
Of
course it's the concept of a winner that is the problem since there is
often no winner because each person challenging the other is working
from a different agenda. As the words begin to flow there should be a
hold to ask what are you wishing to attain and why.
A
different agenda makes all the difference, it substantially effects the
way each person plunges deeper into ever more angry retort and innuendo
and often issues are dragged up that are not relevant but are used to
undermine the person on the other side.
Certain
television shows develop this animosity for the public to gawk at, two
people tearing themselves to pieces in a frustration of trying to obtain
a hearing and hopefully some sort of understanding, egged on by the
shows host ridiculing one or other of the participants. These shows have
high ratings revealing the base instincts people have when faced with a
gladiatorial conflict. Baying for blood describes the process. One sees
it in the fight game where someone is having their head knocked off
their shoulders and the crowd yell for more. In the Coliseum in Romans
times they were always setting their citizens against each other or,
against wild animals in mortal combat with barely a chance of survival.
The crowd loved it, the more gore the better.
I
find it abhorrent but millions differ from me. Should I find this
strange, should I become frustrated by my apparent lack of connectivity
with my fellow man or should I rejoice that mankind is diverse and Vive
la difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment