Under the
heading of national security the right wing Conservatives are hot foot,
mounting an orchestrated onslaught against the Guardian Newspaper.
In
a debate held in Westminster Hall, an adjunct of the main debating
chamber,the Tory's had obtained time to debate the matter of the the
release of information to the Guardian by David Miranda and Glen
Greewald, journalists living in South America. Greewalds partner had
been held for a number of hours at Heathrow Airport at the behest of the
security services in line with the American attempt to hold Edward
Snowden, another whistle blower with sensitive information who
eventually fled to Russia.
I have rarely seen such misuse of
parliamentary procedure in that, normally debate is held under the rules
of debate whereby the right of questioning the debater is nearly always
given, the only constraint is usually time when the person standing , giving the debate wishes to proceed with the points he is trying to put across and refuses to be interrupted.
In
this particular debate the Tory members were scathing in their
complaint against the Guardian Newspaper but their blatant refusal to
allow the Labour members to stand and offer alternative views was a sad,
unhealthy sight. The debate was ruled by the rules of debate but the
concept of "Parliamentary Democracy", where all views are heard, was
totally disregarded. Each Tory member was allowed to stand and have
their say, each New Labour member was told to keep quiet !! I found this
one of the most distasteful meetings I have ever witnessed in the
Houses of Parliament and would hope that it is not a preview of things
to come.
There is a strong danger that open debate in society at
large on such issues as Race, Religion, Sexuality, and now Security
matters becomes very difficult as powerful elements in society seek to
blanket comment and discussion.
The fearful condition of our
Economy, not withstanding the good news stories released about recent
marginal growth, has given Parliament the opportunity to enact draconian
measures including the fire sale of the Post Office at a share
valuation which enable massive profit for the City investor. The
privatisation of the National Health, handing the Medical Practitioners
the potential to push prescriptive dugs onto the patient whilst the
same Practitioner (now running a business) is enabled to trade with the
suppliers of the drug. The danger that such a position of power brings is obvious.
The
judgement that the ordinary man and women in society shall be the main
conduit for finding firstly the funds to prop up the failing banks with
taxpayers money and now to reign down on the heads of the poorest
members of society with such as the bed-room tax is a trend that makes
me very sad indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment